Most burns are painful and can even be life-changing for the patient. With the right treatment and therapies throughout the healing journey, we can help patients return to daily life faster.
Fill out the form below and a representative will contact you with more information regarding our burns solution.
No more trauma
Around the world, burn patients have suffered enough. Therefore, burn survivors need the best possible treatment that reduces additional trauma in the most gentle way.
No more compromises
Effective burn healing
Undisturbed wound healing should be promoted. Using dressings that minimize the risk of maceration, provide an antimicrobial barrier and allow for long wear-time is essential. Pain and stress are contributors to delayed wound healing, therefore it is also key to select a dressing that minimizes additional trauma.1
Patient satisfaction
Experiencing pain and distress is not only a bad foundation for healing, it is also agonizing for the patient. Choosing a dressing that minimizes pain and anxiety at dressing change will contribute to higher patient satisfaction.
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-effectiveness is an important factor in implementing a treatment regimen for burns. Dressings associated with fewer dressing changes, nursing time, or analgesic use can reduce total cost of care.
Article
Summary: Efficacy of a Silver-Containing Foam Dressing in the Management of Partial-Thickness Burns
Continue Reading
The power of gentle
Our product portfolio does not make compromises. It provides effective care and reduces additional trauma and suffering – every step of the way. This means undisturbed wound healing, improved cost-effectiveness, and a better patient experience 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
Pain reduction enabled by Safetac® Technology:
- No adherence to the moist wound bed
- Gentle removal
- Minimized trauma to the wound bed and surrounding skin
- Less pain at dressing changes
Traditional Adhesive |
For health care professionals
Burns represent a challenging wound type and are associated with a complex burn care continuum. At Mölnlycke, we are committed to support you in your daily clinical practice with:
- Education content: webinars, e-learnings
- Clinical Resources: summaries of clinical trials/studies
- Tips & tricks: cutting and application guide
For every one impacted by a wound
Burns happen to people every day all around the world. But most burns are preventable, and by knowing how to provide first aid it's often possible to reduce severity.
Did you, for example, know you should immediately pour cool or lukewarm water on a burn for 20 minutes?
At Mölnlycke, we work to raise awareness and lower the impact of burns. You can be a part of this movement by learning more about how to act when a burn occurs and how to avoid burns in the first place.
- Upton D, Solowiej K. Pain and stress as contributors to delayed wound healing. Wound Practice and Research 2010, Vol. 18(3).
- Gee Kee EL, Kimble RM, Cuttle L, Khan A, Stockton KA. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children. Burns 2015, 41(5):946-955.
- Silverstein P, Heimbach D, Meites H et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Res 2011, 32(6): 617-626.
- Gee Kee EL, Stockton K, Kimble RM et al. Cost-effectiveness of silver dressings for paediatric partial thickness burns: An economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial. Burns 2017, 43(4): 724-732.
- Aggarwala S, Harish V, Roberts S et al. Treatment of partial thickness burns: a prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing Biobrane, Acticoat, Mepilex Ag and Aquacel Ag. J Burn Care Res 2020, 42(5): 934-43.
- Tang H, Lv G, Fu J et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter investigation evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of Mepilex Ag versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015, 78(5): 1000-1007.